Evaluation of Forest Cover Development in Protected Areas in Laos

Analysis of Forest Cover Loss in Four Protected Areas (2000-2024)

Laos
Protected Areas
Forest Loss
Evaluation
Conservation Outcomes
Author
Affiliation

Johannes Schielein

KfW Development Bank

Published

January 12, 2026

Modified

April 29, 2026

Abstract

This evaluation report analyzes forest cover development in four protected areas in Laos, examining forest cover loss dynamics from 2000 to 2024. The analysis utilizes Global Forest Watch data to assess conservation outcomes and forest stock development, supporting evaluation of protected area management effectiveness.

Introduction

This evaluation report analyzes forest cover development in four protected areas in Laos to support the evaluation of conservation outcomes and forest stock development. The analysis focuses on forest cover loss dynamics from 2000 to 2024, utilizing publicly available satellite data to assess trends and patterns in forest conservation.

Purpose of the Evaluation

The evaluation aims to:

  • Assess forest cover development trends in four target protected areas
  • Compare deforestation rates in project areas against other national protected areas
  • Provide empirical evidence for evaluating conservation outcomes
  • Support decision-making for future conservation investments

Data Sources and Methodology

This analysis utilizes:

  • World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA/IUCN) - For protected area boundaries and metadata
  • Global Forest Watch (Hansen et al., 2013) - For forest cover loss detection using GFC-2024-v1.12
  • mapme.biodiversity R package - For automated data acquisition and processing

Methodology Notes:

  • Forest cover loss is defined as “a stand-replacement disturbance, or a change from a forest to non-forest state”
  • Forest cover is defined as tree cover ≥10% with minimum patch size of 1 hectare
  • Analysis period: 2000-2024 (25 years)
  • Cumulative deforestation is calculated from the year 2001 onward
NoteProject Timeline

The financing agreement for the project was signed in 2015. However, implementation activities started effectively in 2018 with participatory land use planning. The main implementation phase lasted from 2018 to 2023, during which village contracts were signed, forest patrols were conducted, and microcredit programs were established.

Note: Hin Nam No National Park was only supported through ancillary measures and is sometimes not listed as a formal project site. Where relevant, averages are shown both with and without Hin Nam No.

Analyzed Protected Areas

The evaluation focuses on four protected areas in Laos that are part of the evaluation portfolio:

NoteNotes on Duplicate and Cross-Border Entries

Several protected areas appear multiple times in the WDPA database. The following duplicates and cross-border entries have been excluded from this analysis:

  • Nam Ha ASEAN Heritage Park (WDPA ID 555756396) — duplicate of Nam Ha National Protected Area (71252)
  • Nam Poui (WDPA ID 555756393) — duplicate of Nam Poui (10132)
  • Phou Xieng Thong (WDPA ID 555756394) — duplicate of Phou Xieng Thong (18893)
  • Phong Nha-Ke Bang / Hin Nam No (WDPA ID 900883) — cross-border UNESCO World Heritage site spanning Laos and Vietnam (not comparable to national-level PAs)

Map

Forest Cover Development (2000-Present)

Forest cover development is quantified using Global Forest Watch data (Hansen et al., 2013). This section presents overall trends in forest cover and loss across the analysis period.

Summary Statistics

Temporal Analysis of Deforestation

This section presents cumulative deforestation trends and forest cover development for project areas and all analyzed protected areas.

Cumulative Forest Cover Loss (2001-2024) for Project PAs

Cumulative Forest Cover Loss (2001-2024) for All PAs

Forest Cover (2000-2024) for Project PAs

Forest Cover (2000-2024) for All PAs

Key Findings

Based on the empirical analysis of forest cover data from 2000 to 2024 for all 26 protected areas in Laos, the following key findings emerge:

Overall Forest Cover Development

The analysis reveals that all protected areas in Laos have experienced forest cover loss over the analysis period. The total forest cover loss across all 26 protected areas from 2000 to 2024 amounts to 479,213 hectares.

Project Areas Performance (all four):

  • The four project areas account for 11.5% of total forest loss across all Lao protected areas
  • Average relative loss in project areas (incl. Hin Nam No): 9.08%
  • Average relative loss in project areas (excl. Hin Nam No): 11.75%
  • Average relative loss in other protected areas: 13.65%
NoteNote on Hin Nam No

Hin Nam No National Park was only supported through ancillary measures and is sometimes not listed as a formal project site. Its deforestation rate is very low compared to all other national protected areas. Where averages for project areas are reported, values are shown both with and without Hin Nam No to provide a more differentiated picture.

Deforestation Trend Comparison

Comparing average annual deforestation rates in the pre-implementation period (2010–2015) versus the implementation phase (2018–2023):

  • Project areas (incl. Hin Nam No): average annual loss increased from 566 ha/year to 798 ha/year (+41.1%)
  • Project areas (excl. Hin Nam No): average annual loss increased from 747 ha/year to 1044 ha/year (+39.7%)
  • Other (non-project) protected areas: average annual loss increased from 604 ha/year to 1435 ha/year (+137.8%)

Annual deforestation rates increased continuously across all protected areas in Laos — including in project areas during the implementation phase. However, the increase in deforestation rates was markedly steeper in non-project protected areas.

Area-Specific Patterns

  1. Most Affected Areas: Among all Lao protected areas, the areas with the highest total forest cover loss are Phou Sabot Phoungchong, Dong Phou Vieng, Nam Et-Phouloey. None of these are project areas.

  2. Relative Loss Comparison: When considering relative loss (percentage of original forest cover), project areas show lower relative loss (9.08% vs 13.65% in other PAs).

  3. Hin Nam No: Hin Nam No stands out with a very low deforestation rate compared to all other protected areas. When excluded from project area averages, the remaining three project areas show higher relative loss rates.

Conclusions

The project could not stop or reverse the overall deforestation trend — annual deforestation rates continued to increase in project areas, including during the implementation phase (2018–2023). However, the comparison with non-project protected areas suggests that the project interventions were partially effective: the increase in deforestation rates was substantially lower in project areas than in comparable non-project areas. This indicates that while absolute deforestation targets were not achieved, the project may have contributed to avoiding even greater forest loss.

Data Sources & References

  • WDPA: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (2024), Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)
  • GFW: Hansen, M. C., et al. (2013). High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science, 342(15 November): 850–53. Data version: GFC-2024-v1.12.
  • mapme.biodiversity: R package for automated biodiversity indicator calculation

Report generated: 2026-04-29